Creation Corner

A Column By Frazier Spencer

Logically, we are either:

1) The result of mindless, accidental evolution, or

2) The result of some kind of a creator God.

On the one hand is Evolution that says a speck of matter spontaneously sprang into life, grew, divided multiple times, and after millions of years evolved through a series of mindless, unguided accidents to finally result in the millions of species, including humans, that are alive today.

As a direct opposite to evolution is a Being writing in the Bible who claims He created humans. This being further says He is above all others because He created the wood, stone, metals, the sun and stars; the very materials that make up other gods. (Psm 95: 3-5; 115:3-8; 135: 5, 15-18; Isa 44:all; Jer 10:2-15.) This Being further claims He is the giver of life. (Job 33:4,; Pro 4:4; 7:2; Rom 6:23; Jn 1:3-4.) Strong claims indeed! These very creator claims are one of the major differences between Christianity and other religions.

Revealing the Creator God is a dominant theme that runs throughout the Old Testament. The New Testament is then securely connected to that theme by the first chapter of John which reveals the Word [Jesus Christ] as the One who did the creating.

Humans are unable to see this Being. However, we are assured in Rom 1:20 that the invisible things of Him are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made. Just as we know there is gravity, wind, magnetism, because of what we see them do, so this Being says we can know Him by what he has done and is doing.

Actually proving this Creator seems to be a fundamental starting place for those interested in Christianity. Notice Paul used the Creator (Acts 17:24-25) when revealing God to the pagan philosophers at Athens. And he did it again at Lycaonia. (Acts 14:15) Moreover in the last days an angel is scheduled to preach the creation message to all nations and peoples (Rev 14:7).

Perhaps the best way to add credibility to one’s arguments, and to persuade others, is to use outside references. That is why about 95% of the information used in "Creation Corner" articles are from the "other sides" material, from evolution supporting sources. (Italics or bold emphasis are added to many of the quotes.)

Marvelous are Thy works. (Pam 139:14)

All around us in the air birds fly to and fro. On the ground in the fields, forests, and our own backyards, field mice, squirrels, and various other small animals scurry to and fro. Deer, muskrats, beavers, foxes, and other large animals inhabit rural areas and forests. We are literally surrounded by all kinds of creatures busy doing their thing.

This vast multitude of creatures live….. and then they die.

Yet, how often do we see a dead bird, a dead squirrel, a dead rabbit, a dead deer, a dead whatever? Very rarely indeed. So rarely that when it does happen it seems to be so out of place that it is somewhat troubling. The same thing when we see an occasional man-killed road animal, that too is somewhat unsettling and reminds us of how little we see of animal corpses.

But if we think about it - the ground should be littered with naturally dead birds and animals.

Why then do we so little of dead things?

Ponder for a moment - is it by pure accident that there are so few dead carcasses to be seen? Is it by pure accident that with rare exception we can hike all day through a forest and never see a dead thing? Is it by pure accident that we can enjoy strolling a lake or ocean beach that seems in a pristine state with little or no dead litter that would spoil our enjoyment?

Or, could it possibly be waste disposal systems have been put in operation? Systems so quiet, so efficient, so routine, that we don’t even realize they are at work? Systems so effective that the only time we might think about them is when one item has not been taken care of?

When thinking about waste disposal, vultures might quickly come to mind. They circle around high overhead constantly seeking carrion to feed on. Are vultures part of a system? Have vultures been designed for their purpose? A revealing quote might help answer this question.

Widely acclaimed Nature Scientist, author, and evolution supporter, David Attenborough writes(8), "Vultures have naked heads, for they feed by thrusting their heads inside corpses and feathers would quickly become soiled by blood and guts and would become the source of infections."

John N. Clayton(1) wrote a story about his family as they watched a National Audubon Society documentary on African wildlife. The segment was about a herd of large elephants. In the film, one of the elephants stopped and deposited a huge mass of dung on the ground.

We have seen similar happenings many times. But then came the penetrating logic of a child. The youngest daughter whispered to her father the question,

Good question youngest daughter! One adults should be asking. But instead adults too often take it all for granted and don’t even exercise a child’s questioning attitude.

You see, elephant messes are taken care of!

Those who travel in Africa report they rarely see elephant dung on the ground. There happen to be elephant mess collectors seemingly assigned to that very task.

Scientists recognize the collectors and have named them dung beetles. Clayton explains, "When an elephant deposits a pile of dung, the odor of the material attracts the beetles. Within 15 minutes of being deposited over 3,800 beetles were observed on one sample studied by scientists. Within 30 minutes this sample of over 30 quarts of dung, weighing about 75 pounds, was gone!" Does that seem like an extremely efficient waste disposal system to you? It sure does to me.

Further information is given in the book, "The Science Times Book of Insects"(7). "One research team in Africa reported counting 16,000 beetles on a single elephant pat."

The book continues, "Entomologists have discovered that as many as 120 different species and tens of thousands of representatives of those species will converge on a single large pat of dung as soon as it is laid."

Is it possible 120 species and tens of thousands of collectors are part of a carefully designed planet wide waste disposal system?

Clayton continues, "The beetles had cut the dung into various sizes - from BB size to tennis ball size - and had buried the balls in the ground. Each ball had a beetle egg placed in it. When the baby beetle hatches out of the egg it has all the food it will need until it is able to function on its own."

Consider for a moment if there were no elephant dung beetles. Just four elephants produce a metric ton of dung per day. As a constant week end visitor to Grandpa’s farm, I have stepped around, and yes stepped into, my share of cow pies, so I can well imagine the problems with odor, flies, germs, suffocation of vegetation, etc. that huge 75 pound piles of elephant pies all over the place would cause!

You might think one specific beetle handles elephant dung. Not so. Actually there are over 2,000 species of dung beetles in Africa. Why so many? Wouldn’t just one be enough to do the job? Clayton tells us,

"Well, with so many species, each with its own habits, the dung is scattered and spread out. Some beetles bury the balls as far as three feet under ground while others go just deep enough for it not be visible. Some beetles bury it on the spot, while others roll the ball to a distant location - sometimes as much as 150 feet away."

Is it also possible there has been a carefully thought out scattering plan? Not only is the ground cleared of the dung, the burying also …"fertilizes the soil at several different depths, it puts moisture into the soil that otherwise would evaporate, it aerates the soil by putting holes in it, and it provides food for the life forms that live below the soil."

Are we reading about a waste disposal system that is not only super efficient, but one that has other benefits than just cleaning up messes?

What if there were no dung beetles? Obviously they are very important to the disposal of elephant dung. The book "Alien Empire"(2) gives us another example illustrating their importance. Cattle do not naturally occur in Australia. When cattle were imported, the only dung beetles available were those handling the hard, dry pellets produced by kangaroos. The author tells us:

"These native dung beetles could not cope with the soft cowpats produced by the vast herds of cattle. This created problems. Because the dung was not being disposed of, it acted as a superb breeding site for the bush fly, Musca vetustissima, which is a serious nuisance to both cattle and people. The scale of the problem is huge: each cow produces enough dung annually to cover about 13.5 acres."

The solution? "The African dung beetle, Onthophagus ferox was imported and now helps dispose of cattle dung in Australia".

The book, "Natural History of Insects"(3) gives more information about dung beetles. "One approach [by beetles] is to construct a series of branching subterranean chambers directly beneath the dung. This then lies conveniently to hand to be pulled down below and moulded into a spherical , pear-shaped or sausage-like brood mass."

The authors tells us how some small animals are handled. "A small animal corpse, such as a mouse, is the trigger for a complex suite of behaviors, usually performed by a male and female working together. ….The pair toil away to scrape and bite the fur off the corpse as they gradually inter it inside a "crypt" beneath the ground. Once safely hidden from competitors, the nice clean-shave meaty corpse can now easily be molded into a more or less globular shape, in which the female chews a bowl-shaped depression. It is into this that the larvae eventually crawl, sticking out their tiny heads and begging for food from their parent’s mouths, like chicks in a nest."

The authors add as a matter of interest, "Parents and offspring also communicate with each other through a series of chirps."

Let’s look at one of the tinier creatures. John N. Clayton(1) writes about a study done by Karl Visscher of Cornell University. His study shows "1% to 2% of a bee hive colony is devoted solely to the job of removing dead bees from the hive. These undertaker bees remove any bee that dies in the hive to a distance up to 400 feet away from the hive. To prove that dead bees are truly selecting dead bees,….Visscher deposited freshly killed bees and balsa wood models that resembled dead bees into a hive."

"Within an average of seven minutes, the dead bees were removed from the hive, but it took more than seven hours for the models to be remove…more as a nuisance evidently" So the "undertakers" were shown to be legitimately after dead bees.

The reasons for such fast removal are obvious. Clayton explains, …"by removing them, the diseases from which they might be dying are also removed from the other bees. Left to rot, the dead bees could draw undesirable scavengers and fungus that could threaten the hive."

As we ponder which is true, evolution or creation, we might consider a couple of questions:

• If honeybees evolved, as some say from a fruit fly - becoming a 25% honeybee, to a 50% honeybee, to a 90% honeybee, finally to become a full 100% honeybee - if this is so, at what point did the undertaker bees evolve?
• How does the undertaker bee ratio of 1 to 2% remain so constant? Just enough to do the job, yet not too many so as to burden the hive?

Inside our own bodies are several waste disposal systems. M. Scott Peck, M.D.(4) describes the marvelous system that heals a wound. The process includes waste disposal. The author writes, "Moving through the porous walls, the white blood cells (called "phagocytes" or eating cells) go to the diseased spot and gobble up dead cells, bacteria, dirt, and other debris. They actually digest this debris and then return through the porous walls into the blood vessels. It is a remarkably efficient, microscopic garbage and collection service."

Upon our death another waste system kicks in. In my digestive system, and in yours, at this very moment, are bacteria ready to start the disposal system the minute death occurs.

The book "The PH Miracle"(9) gives us more detail. "The body automatically becomes acidic upon death. Once a body stops breathing, oxygen levels of course decrease, creating the anaerobic ("without oxygen") environment microforms thrive in (in addition to the acid they love).

Then the little buggers get down to work.. Their one big job -one reason they are part of the normal human body - it that they are the principal "undertakers" when we die. These mycotoxins are designed to decompose our dead bodies…. Biologists call it the carbon cycle."

In addition to those internal ones, within working distance are various flies and insects ready to respond to scents that emanate from a new corpse thus signaling them to do their job of disposal. This part of the system is so exact, so well programmed, that detective story fans, such as this writer, are well aware scientists use disposal creatures’ habits to make surprisingly accurate calculations regarding the time of human death.

This is possible because disposal insects follow an exact and pre-determined order.

An article in the Indianapolis Star of April 12, 2003, quotes Purdue University professor Ralph Williams, "Anytime a body is found that has insects or maggots on it, we can be precise in determining the time of death… It’s done through determining what species they are, what life cycles they have, the time of year and the temperatures."

In the book "Maggots, Murder and Men"(5) veteran Forensic Entomologist Dr. Zakaria Erzingclioglu explains this in more detail:

"As time passes and decomposition progresses, different insect species will be attracted to the body at different stages of decay. Bluebottles and greenbottles will arrive to lay their eggs which hatch into maggots that feed voraciously on the tissues. Beetles will arrive, not only to feed upon the tissues, but also upon the maggots. Minute wasps will arrive to parasitize the maggots. Tiny flies, whose very existence remains unguessed by most people, will similarly arrive at various stages of decay and will leave tell-tale signs of their visits.

Myriads of other creatures will arrive at various times, each to leave its mark for future interpretation by those who look into such things.

On the basis of the fact that anything that changes with time can be used as a clock, the succession of insects occurring on a dead body can, in principle, be exploited as a measure of time since death."

We are now confronted with some questions of logic:

• If all creatures are in a race for the survival of the fittest, why don’t all of these flies, beetles, and insects rush to a new corpse at the same time?
• What is holding them back?
• What makes them go only in their allotted turn?
• And await their turn with such regularity and patience?
• So regular and so consistent are they that man can devote a whole science to the study of them and the conclusions that can be drawn from their very consistency!

Could it have been a Master Planner/programmer who put together the arrangement of body temperature, odors, and the like and then programmed and matched those signals to the particular insect needed for each part of the job?

This writer has mentioned before the advantage our generation has over previous ones. Because we use computers, we should be able to "see" something a Creator God has "made" by recognizing programming when it has been done in nature, Programming is something previous generations of humans without computers could not even begin to imagine.

How important to us anyway is an earth that has constant waste disposal systems?

In the book "The Science Times Book of Insects"(7), the authors put it like this, "There is the dung beetle, whose cleanup efforts save the planet from becoming a pigsty."

In the book "Alien Empire"(2), this conclusion is made, "Without insects, we would be inundated with dead plant and animal material."

Another statement is this one, "They [insects] process more flesh than all the large carnivores - crocodiles and alligators, lions, tigers, and wolves - put together."

In the book "The Secret Life of Germs"(6), the author says that without germs (and insects) "Before thousands of years had passed there wouldn’t be an inch of ground left for plants to grow on or for other organisms to live on. The very oceans would be thick with corpses."

"Without germs (and insects), all of the Earth would soon be one great garbage dump and graveyard spinning lifelessly in space."

It seems as if constant waste disposal systems are vitally important.

We have looked at the following:

• A 75 pound pile of elephant dung was taken care of within 30 minutes.
• 16,000 beetles were observed on one pile of dung.
• There is in place a method that brings about the helpful scattering of that dung.
• Learned the work of dung beetles is so important they had to be imported into Australia.
• Considered the naked heads needed by vultures as they do their scavenger job.
• Learned in detail how small corpses, like mice, have a disposal system that goes into action.
• Learned about "undertaker" bees.
• Considered waste disposal at a wound site in our own bodies.
• Considered the various insects that operate on an exact time schedule to aid the breakdown of a human corpse.
• Been told by scientists that efficient waste disposal is vital to continued life on our planet.

We have just scratched the surface on this subject. It is hoped sufficient examples have been presented so readers can agree there are in fact quiet and highly efficient waste disposal systems in place all around us. So efficient and so smoothly operating we take little notice of them. But if they would cease to operate for just a few days, we would soon notice it very much indeed!

We have to ask ourselves, are all of these waste disposal systems the result of Evolution which admittedly is:

mindless,

purposeless,

accidental chance?

Or, are they more logically the result of:

planning,

design,

programming,

an intelligent Creator?

Which alternative makes more sense to you?